Search Article 
 
Advanced search 
Official publication of the American Biodontics Society and the Center for Research and Education in Technology
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 102-105

Interceptive management of winged maxillary central incisors


1 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Nobel Medical College and Teaching Hospital, CODS, Kathmandu, Nepal
2 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kantipur Dental College, Kathmandu, Nepal
3 Department of Dentistry, Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
4 Dental surgeon, Prakash Dental Clinic, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication8-Aug-2013

Correspondence Address:
Mamta Dali
Nobel Medical College and Teaching Hospital, CODS, Biratnagar
Nepal
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2155-8213.116342

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Introduction: Winged maxillary incisors are a well-recognized clinical finding, which can result in psychological trauma to children at growing age. Interceptive treatment is usually carried out in mixed dentition period in order to reduce the severity of a developing malocclusion in future. Case Report: This paper reports a case of 6-years-old female patient with winged maxillary central incisor being treated with derotation technique using the beggs brackets along with nance palatal arch space maintainer. Discussion: The major advantages in carrying out this treatment with fixed brackets are the ease with which the force magnitude and vector can be controlled much more precisely than with a removable appliance, minimal discomfort to the patient and reduces the need for patient co-operation.

Keywords: Early derotation, interceptive management, winged maxillary central incisor


How to cite this article:
Dali M, Dikshit P, Agarwal NK, Shrestha A. Interceptive management of winged maxillary central incisors. Dent Hypotheses 2013;4:102-5

How to cite this URL:
Dali M, Dikshit P, Agarwal NK, Shrestha A. Interceptive management of winged maxillary central incisors. Dent Hypotheses [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Aug 19];4:102-5. Available from: http://www.dentalhypotheses.com/text.asp?2013/4/3/102/116342


  Introduction Top


Interceptive treatment is usually carried out in order to reduce the severity of a developing malocclusion. This type of treatment is very often indicated and carried out in the mixed dentition, and brings with it unique challenges. [1]

Winged incisors are a well-recognized clinical finding. Maxillary central incisors typically are situated in their sockets in such a way that their occlusal contour follows the normal arc of the maxillary dentition. However, in some reported cases, the distal margins of the incisors are rotated in a labial or lingual direction. Lingual rotation has been termed counter winging by Dahlberg, whereas labial rotation is simply winging. On occasion, incisor rotation is an obvious function of anterior tooth crowding, especially in cases of counter winging. However, instances are also seen of unilateral and bilateral counter winging and winging, which clearly are not functions of tooth crowding. [2]

The maxillary central incisor may show a wide range of variability, [3] particularly with regard to the : l0 abial outline, labial lobe grooves, labial profile curvature, mamelons, cingulum, root size. [4] It has been found that abnormal dental features were the most common reason for causing psychological trauma in children especially in the 9-10 year age group. [5]

Evidences suggest that a short course of orthodontic treatment in the mixed dentition may results in improved function and aesthetics thereby reduces the psychological trauma and remains relatively stable in future. [1]

This paper reports a case of 6-years-old female patient presented with winged maxillary central incisor being treated with derotation technique using beggs brackets along with nance palatal arch space maintainer.


  Case Report Top


A 6-year-old female child reported to the Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry with the chief complains of rotated upper front tooth. On intraoral examination, maxillary left central incisor (11) was found to be erupting in a rotated position, whereas 21 erupted with normal pattern [Figure 1]. She presented with a class I molar relationship in the mixed dentition period. Grossly, decayed deciduous first molar (54, 64) were present bilaterally on maxillary arch [Figure 2]. Deep carious lesions were seen on mandibular right and left second molars (75, 85) [Figure 3].
Figure 1: Rotated 11

Click here to view
Figure 2: Occlusal view showing root stumps i.r.t 55, 65

Click here to view
Figure 3: Deep carious lesion i.r.t 75 and 85

Click here to view


The derotation technique for winged maxillary right central incisor was planned followed by nance palatal arch space maintainer. Pulp therapy followed by stainless steel crowns (3M ESPE, California, US) for mandibular second molars was planned (75, 85).

Nance palatal arch space maintainer was fabricated after extraction of 54 and 64 with molar tubes welded on molar bands. The derotation procedure was carried out by bonding beggs bracket on labial and palatal aspect of 11. Two separate cross elastics (3M Unitek, California, USA) were placed on brackets on labial and palatal aspects, which were engaged to the respective molar tubes of each side of the space maintainer [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Beggs brackets placed on labial and palatal aspects i.r.t 11 and cross elastics engaged to molar tubes welded to molar bands.

Click here to view


Debonding of the brackets were carried out once positive over jet and overbite established followed by the placement of composite ribbond fiber on the palatal aspects of 11 and 21 as a retainer [Figure 5]a and b and continuation of the nance palatal arch space maintainer was planned as there were premature extraction of deciduous first molar bilaterally due to caries [Figure 6]. Pulp therapy followed by stainless steel crown was carried out in 75 and 85 [Figure 7]. Total orthodontic treatment time taken was 7 weeks. Patient was informed to follow up in every 3 months.
Figure 5

Click here to view
Figure 6: Nance palatal arch space maintainer

Click here to view
Figure 7: Stainless steel crown (75, 85)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Various cases of rotated or winged and atypically formed teeth have been reported previously in the literature. [4],[6] This patient did not have any orofacial deformities such as cleft lip and palate, where such variations may be expected. Winged or rotated and malformed teeth have often been found to be accompanied by other dental anomalies such as malpositions of adjacent teeth, retained deciduous teeth, dilacerations, supernumeraries, and malformation of several teeth in the same patient. [6],[7] Although winging could be attributed to the mild crowding present in the anterior region, no definite explanation was present for the atypical morphology of the central incisors because there was no evidence of any other associated dental anomaly.

Knowledge of the biomechanical principles of tooth movement is essential for the orthodontist to execute an individualized treatment plan. If the location of the center of resistance of a tooth or group of teeth is known, the correct moment-to-force ratio can be applied at the brackets to obtain specific centers of rotation-in other words, controlled movement. The studies have shown that the location of the center of resistance of the maxillary central incisor depends on the palatal bone level and is at approximately two-thirds of the palatal alveolar bone height, measured from the root apex. A greater moment-to-force ratio is needed for any controlled movement of the maxillary incisors during the retraction in patients with reduced palatal alveolar bone height.

Treatment may start as soon as sufficient permanent teeth have erupted and the child should be co-operative enough to have bands cemented and brackets bonded. Placement of the fixed appliance usually only takes a little longer time than the required to fit a removable appliance and may be even carried out at a single visit. Although there needs to be patient co-operation for the placement, adjustment and removal of the appliance, the importance of compliance during active treatment is usually less than that for a removable appliance. [1]

Treatment carried out in mixed dentition stage may take as little as a couple of weeks, but in the more difficult cases it can be longer. In the majority of cases, the end result can be more effectively and efficiently achieved than if a removable appliance was used. In this case, the treatment was started in early mixed dentition period, but however, definitive treatment may probably require in the permanent dentition, but the complexity and duration of the further treatment may be significantly reduced in future.

The major advantages in carrying out this treatment with fixed brackets are the ease with which the force magnitude and vector can be controlled much more precisely than with a removable appliance, minimal discomfort to the patient and reduces need for patient co-operation.

Although rotations can be treated at various stages of root development, an early correction of rotated teeth before root completion is conducive to better retention. Early, derotation of the central incisors was planned and achieved to reduce any possible psychological trauma. [2]


  Conclusion Top


Even though, there may be slightly more chair side time required to fit the appliance, there is no laboratory cost involved. The functional improvement coupled with the obvious psychological benefit gives this simple and easily placed appliance a significant advantage over the traditional method of treating these potentially challenging mixed dentition problems.

 
  References Top

1.Dowsing P, Sandler PJ. How to effectively use a 2 x 4 appliance. J Orthod 2004;31:248-58.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Prasad VN, Utreja A, Goyal A, Chawla HS. Winged maxillary central incisors with unusual morphology: A unique presentation and early treatment. Angle Orthod 2005;75:478-82.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Jordan RE, Abrams L, Kraus BS. Anatomy of the individual teeth. In: Kraus Dental Anatomy and Occlusion. 2 nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Mosby; 1992. p. 8-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Pindborg JJ. Abnormalities of tooth morphology. Pathology of the Dental Hard Tissues. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1970. p. 39.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Shaw WC, Meek SC, Jones DS. Nicknames, teasing, harassment and the salience of dental features among school children. Br J Orthod 1980;7:75-80.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Scott GR, Potter RH, Noss JF, Dahlberg AA, Dahlberg T. The dental morphology of Pima Indians. Am J Phys Anthropol 1983;61:13-31.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Shafer WG. Developmental disturbances of oral and paraoral structures. A Textbook of Oral Pathology. 4 th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Company; 1993. p. 38-45.  Back to cited text no. 7
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3518    
    Printed81    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded384    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal