Dental Hypotheses

ERRATUM
Year
: 2017  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 53-

Erratum: Comparison of the efficacy and side effects of chlorhexidine mouthrinses with (Hexidine) and without (Epimax) alcohol


 

Correspondence Address:




How to cite this article:
. Erratum: Comparison of the efficacy and side effects of chlorhexidine mouthrinses with (Hexidine) and without (Epimax) alcohol.Dent Hypotheses 2017;8:53-53


How to cite this URL:
. Erratum: Comparison of the efficacy and side effects of chlorhexidine mouthrinses with (Hexidine) and without (Epimax) alcohol. Dent Hypotheses [serial online] 2017 [cited 2020 May 28 ];8:53-53
Available from: http://www.dentalhypotheses.com/text.asp?2017/8/2/53/206106


Full Text

In the article titled, “Comparison of the Efficacy and Side Effects of Chlorhexidine Mouthrinses with (Hexidine) and without (Epimax) Alcohol” published in pages 137-141, issue 4, vol. 7 of Dental Hypotheses[1], the sentence under the heading “Ethical approval” is written incorrectly as “This randomized clinical trial was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (#392408) and Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (#201402164877N18).”. The sentence should be read correctly as “This randomized clinical trial was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (#392408) and Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT201504244877N27).”

References

1Mogharehabed A, Behfarnia P, Nasri N, Iranmanesh P, Gholami SA, Yaghini J. Comparison of the efficacy and side effects of chlorhexidine mouthrinses with (Hexidine) and without (Epimax) alcohol. Dent Hypotheses 2016; 7:137–141.