Search Article 
Advanced search 
Official publication of the American Biodontics Society and the Center for Research and Education in Technology
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 55-56

Evidence-based policymaking and contemporary dental researches

Independent Research Scientist, Founder and Managing Editor of Dental Hypotheses, Isfahan, Iran

Date of Web Publication8-Aug-2017

Correspondence Address:
Jafar Kolahi
N0 24, Faree 15, Pardis, Shahin Shahr, Isfahan - 83179 18981
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_31_17

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kolahi J. Evidence-based policymaking and contemporary dental researches. Dent Hypotheses 2017;8:55-6

How to cite this URL:
Kolahi J. Evidence-based policymaking and contemporary dental researches. Dent Hypotheses [serial online] 2017 [cited 2023 Mar 23];8:55-6. Available from:

We are generally familiar with the term “evidence-based dentistry” in which the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, and meta-analyses are used as the support for clinical decision making. On the other hand, evidence-based policymaking is not well-known among dental research community and policymakers. A simple search of dental journals via the PubMed query “(Evidence-based [All Fields] AND policymaking [All Fields]) AND jsubsetd[text]” revealed zero results.

Nevertheless, what is evidence-based policymaking? According to Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative: “Policymakers should use the best available research and information at all stages of the policy process and in each branch of government.”[1]

Evidence-based policymaking has four principles:[2]
  1. Build and compile rigorous evidence about what works, including costs and benefits.
  2. Monitor program delivery and use impact evaluation to measure program effectiveness.
  3. Use rigorous evidence to improve programs, scale what works, and redirect funds away from consistently ineffective programs.
  4. Encourage innovation and test new approaches.

Nowadays, evidence-based policymaking is the cornerstone of scientific agenda, and research scientists want to support bridge the evidence-policy gap.[3] Of more interest, the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005 stablished Evidence-Informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) to encourage the systematic use of health research findings in policymaking.[4]

Nevertheless, previous reports indicated that evidence-based policymaking is not common in dentistry.[5],[6] In this study, contemporary dental literature was analyzed. On May 27 2017, dental literature was explored using the PubMed query “1800/1/1”[PDAT]: “2017/12/31” [PDAT] AND jsubsetd[text]. A total of 581,896 PubMed results were found, of which the most recent 25,000 results were included in this cross-sectional survey. To find and investigate relevant policy documents, Altmetric database (Altmetric LLP, London, UK) was employed.[7] Disappointingly, only 52 articles were found which were cited by 17 policy documents. In other words, only 0.2% of dental articles were used for evidence-based policymaking. First evidences of dental evidence-based policymaking have been raised from June 2015 [Figure 1], reflecting this as a new and emerging concept in dentistry. Results of this survey showed that among different institutions, the Association Scientific Medical Societies in Germany had the most number of mentions (67%) [Figure 2]. Moreover, International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Clinical Oral Investigations had the most number of mentions among different journals [Figure 3]. Ninety percent of the articles cited by policy documents had an Altmetric score between 3 and 17.
Figure 1: Time frame breakdown of mentions by policy documents

Click here to view
Figure 2: Number of mentions by different institutions

Click here to view
Figure 3: Number of mentions by different dental journals

Click here to view

Furthermore, the current gap between dental research and dental health policy is not acceptable and should be bridged. To develop evidence, scientists need to conduct time consuming clinical trials to create knowledge and present it in a form that is understandable for policymakers who necessarily do not think as scientists. On the other hand, policymakers at many levels of government can only gather limited information before making emotional and quick decisions known as “bounded rationality”[3] Further, there is no clear point in the “policy cycle” at which scientists can inject evidence.[3] To overcome these paradoxes scientists need to pay more attention to demand for evidence, and policymakers must do their best to consider the best available evidences in policy process. However, despite several difficulties, evidence-based policymaking can provide favorable result for community health. The “Philadelphia Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax” would be a good example.[8] As a final point, researchers and journal editors must pay more attention to this concept which has direct influence on public health.


I would like to thank Mrs. Stacy Konkiel from Altmetric LLP (London, U.K) for her valuable assistance.

  References Top

Vanlandingham G, Silloway T, Chang V et al. Evidence-Based Policymaking. A guide for effective government. The Pew Charitable Trusts Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative.∼/media/assets/2014/11/evidencebasedpolicymakingaguideforeffectivegovernment.pdf. Published 2014. [Last accessed on November 30, 2016].  Back to cited text no. 1
Principles of Evidence-Based Policymaking. Evidence-Based Policymaking Collaborative. [Last accessed on June 3,2017].  Back to cited text no. 2
The politics of evidence-based policymaking. Science − The Guardian. 2016 /mar/10/the-politics-of-evidence-based-policymaking. [Last accessed on June 3, 2017].  Back to cited text no. 3
What is Evidence-Informed Policy-making and EVIPNet? WHO. 2016. [Last accessed on June 3,2017].  Back to cited text no. 4
Kolahi J, Khazaei S. Altmetric: Top 50 dental articles in 2014. BDJ 2016;220:569-74.  Back to cited text no. 5
Kolahi J, Iranmanesh P, Khazaei S. Altmetric analysis of 2015 dental literature: A cross sectional survey. BDJ 2017;222:695-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
Konkiel S. What can altmetrics tell us about interest in dental clinical trials? Dent Hypotheses 2017;8:31.  Back to cited text no. 7
  [Full text]  
Purtle J, Langellier BL, Scherban F. A Case Study of the Philadelphia Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policymaking Process. J Public Heal Manag Pract 2017:1.  Back to cited text no. 8


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Altmetric analysis of the contemporary scientific literature in Endodontology
J. Kolahi,S. Khazaei,P. Iranmanesh,A. Khademi,M. H. Nekoofar,P. M. H. Dummer
International Endodontic Journal. 2019;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Altmetric analysis of contemporary Iranian Medical Journals
Jafar Kolahi,Saber Khazaei,Elham Bidram,Roya Kelishadi
International Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2019; 10(1): 112
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Altmetric analysis of contemporary dental literature
J. Kolahi,S. Khazaei
BDJ. 2018; 225(1): 68
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded404    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal